About the Author - Peter Nollert

Peter Nollert

I'm Peter Nollert and I write this blog to point researchers to topics that are relevant to protein crystallization. My mission is to help spread knowledge that is 'out there on the web' and help you succeed with your protein structure research.  I oversee the membrane protein research and technology development activities at Emerald BioStructures. Check out The GPCR blog, or my publications

Protein Crystallization Hits

The new Emerald Bio

by Peter Nollert
February 13, 2012 18:50

Exciting news that I need to share with you: the growing Emerald adopts a new name and leadership: 

We're Emerald Bio now:

 

The details of our transformation are given in this news release: Leading Proteomics Company Transitions to Emerald Bio, Chooses Key Leadership to Address Growing Market Opportunities

George Abe, new Chief Executive Officer and Peter Nollert, new Chief Technologist at Emerald Bio

We're looking forward to continuing to supply you with Emerald's protein crystallization screening kits, protein crystallization optimization reagents, stock solutions, protein crystallization plates and with sophisticated laboratory instrumentation such as the Opti Matrix Maker for the production of crystallization optimization matrices and the Protein Maker for parallel protien production. 

There's more to come.

 

Cheers,

Peter


Tags: Announcements | Future | News

Highlights from SLAS2012

by Peter Nollert
February 10, 2012 20:12

This was an exciting SLAS2012 meeting this week! The first inaugural combined Lab Automation and SBS meeting under one roof. More than 5,800 attendees made their way to the San Diego Conference Center to talk liquid handling and dispensation instrumentation, protein sample production and automation. I really enjoyed the lively atmosphere created by scientists meeting engineers.

The main things that stuck in my head were:

Protein biologics are heterogenous: Pete Schulz showed a slide, displaying the analysis of a biologic drug sample. There were many peaks, indicating many protein species. He said that were this an HPLC trace of a small molecule drug, the responsible medicinal chemists would be in jail

HTS is dead: The transition from blind high-throughput to smart high-content screening in for lead compound discovery has progressed further. This is made possible by careful analysis of samples with several techniques at the same time

Proteins are not their amino acid sequence: There is a lot more attention to minute detail in protein modifications and how they impact functional screening. For instance how methylations of Arg and Lys residues on protein molecules effect lead discovery screening outcomes

Many flavors of SPR (surface plasmon resonance). In addition to different surface attachment methods there are now sophisticated experimental techniques and interesting SPR formats such as spotted arrays or homogenous solutions

•  'orthogonal pooling'. This is a smart compound mixing schema to reduce the number of  experiments required to identify fragment binding in a HTS campaign. Simply put, pools are created by combining compounds from the same rows and columns in a plate and only those hits that pop up twice identify a compound as a true candidate. Not sure if and how this concept can be applied to crystallization, but I'd be eager to hear any suggestions from you.

Every attendee received this SLAS2012 pin 

 

Cheers,

Peter

 

Tags: Conference | New Techniques

Widening the protein production pipeline up-stream: Lysis scouting with the Protein Maker

by Peter Nollert
January 27, 2012 20:39

Some of you may know that Emerald BioStructures, as part of the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease (SSGCID) has contributed to submitting more than 444 protein structures to the PDB in the past 4 years. That's quite an achievement and my congratulations go out to the project teams that are behind these structures, most of them determined via X-ray crystallography. Some of this output, including methods used to achieve this level of productivity, are described in the  September 2011 issue of Acta Cryst F.

One of the protein production methods that has been key for several of my own 2011 protein crystallization projects: lysis scouting with the Protein Maker instrument (described in this open access article "The Protein Maker: an automated system for high-throughput parallel purification". 

 

Smith, E., Begley, D., Anderson, V., Raymond, A., Haffner, T., Robinson, J., Edwards, T., Duncan, N., Gerdts, C., Mixon, M., Nollert, P., Staker, B., & Stewart, L. (2011). The Protein Maker: an automated system for high-throughput parallel purification Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, 67 (9), 1015-1021 DOI: 10.1107/S1744309111028776

 

What is lysis scouting?

Stated simply, lysis scouting combines the testing of a set of cell-lysis buffer conditions with IMAC (ion metal affinity chromatography) . This is done to increase the yield of proteins that appear partially soluble or insoluble under standard lysis buffer conditions.  This procedure results in a clear path forward for scaled-up production of purified protein samples for protein crystallization trials.

 

How is lysis scouting done?

A single batch of protein expressing E.coli cells is split into 12 pools and lysed by sonication in 12 different buffer conditions. The paper shows as an example P450 51 A1 (CYP51A1) with a 6xHis-Smt tag. This is the outline of the lysis scouting protocol:

  1. Prepare 12 aliquots, each corresponding to 3 g of wet cell paste
  2. Resuspend in 30 mL lysis buffer (one out of an array of 12) - see table below.


Cell lysis buffers for testing lysis conditions of recombinantly expressed fungal cytochrome P450

 

3. Sonicate to lyse and spin to remove cell debris

4. Clarify lysates and load on 12 x 1 mL Ni-affinity matrix column

5. Wash, elute and analyze fractions

SDS-PAGE showing that buffers 1C and 1D extract much more of the target protein CYP51A1 (red boxes). L(load), W(wash) and E(elution) fractions are shown next to MW standards.

 

While well expressed, CYP51A seemed insoluble using standard cell-lysis methods. The lysis-scouting procedure yielded a buffer system with a detergent (CHAPS or octyl glucoside)  in the presence of high salt concentrations (500 mM NaCl).

 

The utility of the Protein Maker instrument in this process is the short time it takes to run a lysis scouting experiment. Total run time is approximately 1.5 hours (excluding sample analysis). I.e. many proteins can be tested for optimal lysis conditions in a single day - and since the instrument carries out the experiment for you and in parallel, there is plenty of time to strategize the next steps of mg-scale production of the protein sample for crystallization. 

There are many protein structures that we have produced in 2011 that would not exist without Protein Maker supported lysis optimization.

 

A true work horse.

Peter

Tags: Biologics | Literature | New Techniques | Optimization | Product Information | Protein Purification | Purity

Higher throughput protein purification for crystallization success

by Peter Nollert
January 16, 2012 02:41

This week I flew down to San Diego to attend the protein purification sessions at PepTalk . The part I was most interested in was an inaugural session, called 'Higher Throughput Protein Purification" (not going to contemplate the 'higher than what?' issue). There were contributions from the fields of automation, particularly challenging targets, sample management and process development.  Interestingly, there were several common threads that the presenters discussed:

  • Importance of using multiple constructs in purification and crystallization
  • The one-size-fits-all approach is failing more often now with targets becoming more challenging
  • Protein purification requires scouting on the level of lysis, purification and scale-up.

Portion of my 2012 PepTalk program on 'higher throughput protein purification'.

 

Clearly, our game is becoming more difficult on the side of protein purification, requiring new techniques and methods for attacking complex targets. 

 

Cheers,

Peter


 

Tags: Conference

How to keep crystal images and crystallization conditions together

by Peter Nollert
January 7, 2012 02:07

Sorting through my past years' crystallization reports I'm particularly glad about the fact that all of the crystal images are associated with a description of the crystallization precipitation cocktail. In the same image. Of course one can always go back to the original notebook and dig out the particular crystallization condition used, but time tends to cast doubts and having the well solutions directly associated with the crystals shown in  an image is very practical. Here's a simple way to pull out primary screen parameters for association with a particular crystallization experiment:

Let's say the crystallization was done with the JCSG+ screen, formulation from well E4

  • Go to E-Screen Builder 
  • Select Vendor (Emerald BioSystems),  pick screen: JCSG+
  • Click on E4 - et voila, E4 contains 1260 mM Ammonium sulfate, 200 mM Lithium sulfate and 100 mM Tris at pH 8.5.
  • From here you can take a screenshot, or use the 'Snipping Tool' to copy and paste this image right next to the image of the crystal in your report.

 

Finding a particular protein crystallization screen condition is simple: 1. select vendor, 2. select screen, 3. select hit. The crystallization formulation is displayed for you to (4) cut and paste into a crystallization report.

 

Easy, isn't it?

Peter

 

Tags: Best practice | Crystal images | Online Tools | Protein Crystallization

Home Account Info Legal Terms & Conditions Shipping & Return Policies Contact


Log in